Is democracy giving way to corporatism?
It's not merely that those we elect no longer decide. What's so shocking is how many people appear to actively approve of the way that MPs have been emasculated.
Last week it emerged that a court, not voters, now decides if an MP is doing a good job representing their constituents. Human Rights rules now mean that it is not up to those we elect to formulate a whole range of public policy. An alphabet soup of corporatist quangos runs the show, while pretending to answer to ministers. A few dozen clowns in SW1 pretend to be those ministers.
And everywhere audiences cheer the commentator who declares something "too important for party politics".
Party politics is becoming so discredited, many now seem to believe public policy decisions should be left to "experts", judges and officials.
In our moribund democracy, the demos seem to prefer independent watchdogs, commissioners, or even hereditary peers. Anything but party placemen.
For democrats like me, there's no point in explaining that the idea of disinterested technocrats is an illusion, and that no such person exists. Or that deference to supposed "experts" makes it much more difficult to recognise and correct failures. There's no point in saying that leaving it to "experts" was precisely what happened with child protection in Haringey. Or with the Bank of England setting interest rates too low for too long.
It's urgent and vital that we clean up Westminster and bring more competition and accountability to politics. Without it, people will continue to lose faith.
And unless we restore confidence to the Westminster system, people are going to end up preferring a technocracy that is technically inept to a democracy that excludes the people. We’re already half way there.
The photo is of Ayn Rand, whose novel, which touches on some of these themes, I recently came across and
I review here
.
Posted on 7 February 2009 by Douglas Carswell